Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 November 20213277074

21 Tottenhall Road, LONDON, N13 6HY

described in the application form as follows: “Rear canopy attachment to exsiting kitchen extension 4.5 m long , 2.6m width. Front and left side attached to existing kitchen wall extension. Tottal surface 11.7m2 Materials: wood ,stainless steel bolt anchors, PVCu Clear Corrugated on top

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Shrimplin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the residential amenities of neighbours (whether unacceptable harm is caused by overbearing appearance or overshadowing)

What decided it

The simple construction, inset positioning from the boundary, and lower height than the adjoining kitchen extension mean the canopy does not have a materially harmful impact on the living conditions of adjoining neighbours.

Plan policies cited: DMD 8, DMD 11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.