Planning appeal decision
134 Lakenheath, LONDON, N14 4RX
described in the application form as a “first floor side extension with gable end and loft conversion incorporating rear dormer
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Shrimplin R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the appearance of the host building and its surroundings
What decided it
The proposed alterations would restore symmetry to the asymmetrical existing roof and the rear dormer would not be awkward or unsatisfactory in its context, particularly given that similar dormers are commonplace on traditional residential buildings and can often be constructed as permitted development.
The limited contribution to residential accommodation in a sustainable urban location weighed in favour of the appeal, and the scheme was not in conflict with the Development Plan.
Plan policies cited: Core Strategy Policy CP30, Development Management Document Policy DMD6, Development Management Document Policy DMD8, Development Management Document Policy DMD11, Development Management Document Policy DMD13, Development Management Document Policy DMD14, Development Management Document Policy DMD37
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®