Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 July 20223277179

The Brunswick Centre, Bloomsbury, London, WC1N 1BS

described on the application form as: “Class E”

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Hearing
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Perkins L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • If the Council had refused the application, whether the refusal would have been well-founded or not

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate, on the balance of probability, a precise and unambiguous description of the existing use and land, and failed to show that Condition 3 of the 2003 permission no longer restricted the site's use.

Plan policies cited: Policy SH1, Policy SH2

Judgments cited: Lambeth LCB v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2019] UKSC 33; Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; R (Parkview Homes Limited) v Chichester DC [2021] EWHC 59; UBB Waste Essex Ltd v Essex CC [2019] EWHC 1924; Dunnett Investments v SSCLG [2017] EWCA Civ 192; R (Royal London Mutual Insurance Society) v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 3597

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.