Planning appeal decision
The Brunswick Centre, Bloomsbury, London, WC1N 1BS
described on the application form as: “Class E”
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- retail · Change of use
- Inspector
- Perkins L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- If the Council had refused the application, whether the refusal would have been well-founded or not
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate, on the balance of probability, a precise and unambiguous description of the existing use and land, and failed to show that Condition 3 of the 2003 permission no longer restricted the site's use.
Plan policies cited: Policy SH1, Policy SH2
Judgments cited: Lambeth LCB v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2019] UKSC 33; Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; R (Parkview Homes Limited) v Chichester DC [2021] EWHC 59; UBB Waste Essex Ltd v Essex CC [2019] EWHC 1924; Dunnett Investments v SSCLG [2017] EWCA Civ 192; R (Royal London Mutual Insurance Society) v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 3597
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®