Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 December 20213277317

Sandford Mill Sandford Lane, Woodley, READING, RG5 4TB

raised lawn to residential garden and new splayed close boarded fence and replacement gates

Authority
Wokingham Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hand S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged already benefit from planning permission (ground c)
  • Whether planning permission should be granted for the hardstanding, fencing and gates (ground a and s78 appeal)
  • Whether the enforcement notice should be upheld with variations (grounds f and g)

What decided it

The appellant's failure to provide a mandatory Flood Risk Assessment for development in Flood Zone 3a, as required by NPPF footnote 50, despite the potential for the raised hardstanding to displace floodwater.

The benefits of improved access and minimal visual impact on the countryside and landscape were outweighed by the absence of a required Flood Risk Assessment and the potential for the development to create flooding issues.

Framework references: 163, 164

Plan policies cited: CP11, CP1, CP3, CC03

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.