Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 December 20213277317

Sandford Mill Sandford Lane, Woodley, Reading, RG5 4TB

Planning appeal 3277317 at Sandford Mill Sandford Lane, Woodley, Reading, RG5 4TB (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 29 December 2021 by Inspector Hand S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matters alleged already benefit from planning permission (ground c).

raised lawn to residential garden and new splayed close boarded fence and replacement gates

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hand S
Postcode
RG5 4TB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged already benefit from planning permission (ground c)
  • Whether planning permission should be granted for the hardstanding, fencing and gates (ground a and s78 appeal)
  • Whether the enforcement notice should be upheld with variations (grounds f and g)

What decided it

The appellant's failure to provide a mandatory Flood Risk Assessment for development in Flood Zone 3a, as required by NPPF footnote 50, despite the potential for the raised hardstanding to displace floodwater.

The benefits of improved access and minimal visual impact on the countryside and landscape were outweighed by the absence of a required Flood Risk Assessment and the potential for the development to create flooding issues.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP11CP1CP3CC03
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 163Paragraph 164

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

49 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice varied and upheld1 May 20263346384
    Old Billingbear Brickworks, Carters Hill, Binfield, Wokingham, RG40 5RS
  2. Notice varied and upheld4 March 20263358834
    Bluebell Farm, Commonfield Lane, Wokingham, RG40 4RP
  3. Planning permission granted16 January 20253342197
    Poppies Farm , Pound Lane , Hurst Wokingham , RG10 0RS
  4. Notice varied and upheld7 January 20253311592
    Land at New Acres, Nine Mile Road, Wokingham, RG40 3LZ
  5. Notice varied and upheld9 December 20243344473
    Brookfield Farm Old Wokingham Road, Wokingham, RG40 3BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.