Planning appeal decision
Aymestrey Court Bromyard Road, Crown East, Worcester, WR2 5TR
Planning appeal 3277370 at Aymestrey Court Bromyard Road, Crown East, Worcester, WR2 5TR (Malvern Hills District Council) was dismissed on 9 December 2021 by Inspector Hall R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not it has been demonstrated that the proposal would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, having particular regard to trees.
conversion of former gymnasium to dependent relative unit (granny annexe)
- Authority
- Malvern Hills District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Hall R
- Postcode
- WR2 5TR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not it has been demonstrated that the proposal would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, having particular regard to trees
- whether or not it has been demonstrated that the proposal would be acceptable with respect to its effect on biodiversity
- whether or not the proposal would be tantamount to the creation of an independent dwelling
- if the proposal would comprise an independent dwelling, whether its location would be acceptable with regard to access to services and facilities, along with minimising the need to travel and offering sustainable travel choices
What decided it
The proposal would be tantamount to an independent dwelling in an unsustainable countryside location with potential unmitigated harm to trees and biodiversity, contrary to the development plan and Framework.
The limited benefits of creating additional accommodation and local employment did not outweigh the potential harm to character and appearance, biodiversity, and lack of sustainable access to services and facilities.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SWDP21SWDP25SWDP22SWDP2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 174
- Judgments
- Uttlesford DC v SSE & White [1992]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Malvern Hills
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed27 October 20266013516Frenchlands Lane, Lower Broadheath, Worcester, WR2 6QU
- Dismissed22 October 20266002119Land at (Os 7897 6938), Dunley, DY13 0TX
- Allowed13 October 20266014393The Laurels, Kerswell Green, Worcester, WR5 3PE
- Dismissed9 October 20266006301Land off Lightwood Lane, Lower Broadheath, Worcester, WR2 6RL
- Dismissed8 October 20266007831Vaughan Lodge, 192-198 Wells Road, Malvern, WR14 4HB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®