Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of the Coach & Horses PH, Cambridge Road, Newport, Saffron Walden, CB11 3TR
Planning appeal 3277585 at Land to the Rear of the Coach & Horses PH, Cambridge Road, Newport, Saffron Walden, CB11 3TR (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2022 by Inspector Spencer D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Coach and Horses, a Grade II listed building.
erection of 5 detached dwellings (C3) on land to the rear of the existing public house (Sui generis) utilising existing access off Cambridge Road, reconfiguration of public house car park, with associated hard and soft landscaping
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Spencer D
- Postcode
- CB11 3TR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Coach and Horses, a Grade II listed building
- the effect on the character and appearance of the locality
- whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers with regard to privacy and the effect of the proposed dwellings on the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos. 2 and 4 Granta Mead Close with particular reference to privacy
What decided it
The identified less-than-substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building, which was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of five dwellings, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and living conditions, provided clear reasons for refusal that engaged the exception to the tilted balance.
The modest social and economic benefits of providing five dwellings in a sustainable location with a significant housing shortfall were outweighed by the less-than-substantial harm to the heritage setting of the listed building, significant harm to character and appearance, and significant harm to living conditions through loss of privacy; the conflict with the recently made neighbourhood plan policies also attracted substantial weight.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- ULP Policy ENV2ULP Policy GEN2ULP Policy H4NQRNP Policy NQRHA1NQRNP Policy NQRHA2NQRNP Policy NQRHA3NQRNP Policy NQRHD2NQRNP Policy NQRHA4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 14Paragraph 126Paragraph 130Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed26 October 202660102676 Coopers Villas, Coopers End Road, Takeley, CM22 6PT
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Dismissed13 October 20266009731Land North of Tile House Bungalow, Stebbing Green, Dumow, CM6 3TE
- Allowed6 October 20266006335Two Sticks, High Easter Road, High Easter, CM1 4PZ
- Dismissed1 October 20266010951Land North of the Bower House, Clatterbury Lane, Clavering, CB11 4QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®