Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 March 20223277601

Rainham Road North, Becontree Heath, RM10 7EJ

Planning appeal 3277601 at Rainham Road North, Becontree Heath, RM10 7EJ (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 17 March 2022 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if harm would occur, whether that is outweighed by the need to site the installation in the proposed location.

proposed 15m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M
Postcode
RM10 7EJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if harm would occur, whether that is outweighed by the need to site the installation in the proposed location

What decided it

The proposal would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the area that is not outweighed by the benefits of 5G network provision, particularly as it has not been demonstrated that the appeal site is the best available option for minimising such harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP3 of the Core StrategyPolicies BP8, BP11 and BC12 of the Local PlanPolicies D4, D8 and SI6 of the London Plan (2021)Policies SP2, SP4, DMD1 and DMSI9 of the Draft Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 114Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

323 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed6 November 20233321062
    Highways Land, Greenwood Avenue, Dagenham, London, RM10 7DL
  2. Dismissed20 July 20233314718
    Bennett's Castle Lane, Becontree, Dagenham, RM8 3XX
  3. Dismissed25 November 20223288052
    Rainham Road North, Becontree Heath, London, RM10 7JE
  4. Allowed19 July 20223285079
    Roofspace on Oculus House, 16-48 Cambridge Road, London, IG11 8SW
  5. Allowed26 April 20223282590
    Goresbrook Road, Dagenham, RM9 6RT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.