Planning appeal decision
43 Station Road, Frimley, Camberley, Surrey, GU16 7HE
Planning appeal 3277695 at 43 Station Road, Frimley, Camberley, Surrey, GU16 7HE (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2022 by Inspector Chamberlain G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including trees.
Erection of a new building containing a mix of 1- and 2-bedroom flats (25 units) together with associated parking, following the demolition of the existing house
- Authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Chamberlain G
- Postcode
- GU16 7HE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including trees
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 41, 43 and 47 Station Road, with particular reference to outlook, privacy and sun and daylight
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, with particular reference to outlook and amenity space
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular reference to access and parking
- The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to policies relating to development in areas at risk of flooding
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing
What decided it
The cumulative significant harms to character and appearance, living conditions of neighbours and future residents, highway safety, biodiversity, flood risk, and affordable housing provision substantially and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and efficient land use, such that the adverse impacts did not indicate determination otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.
The adverse impacts of significant harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, future resident amenity, highway safety, biodiversity, flood risk, and lack of affordable housing provision substantially and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply, economic activity, and efficient land use, such that the proposal should be determined in accordance with the development plan despite the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP2Policy DM9Policy CP11Policy DM11Policy CP14Policy DM10Policy CP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 130(f)Paragraph 111Paragraph 174Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 163Paragraph 11Paragraph 63
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed21 May 20266002295Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
- Allowed16 April 20266002682Holly Lodge, Catena Rise, Lightwater, Surrey, GU18 5RD
- Allowed6 February 20263370563Atv Go Karts , Blackstroud Lane East, Lightwater, Surrey, GU18 5XR
- Allowed19 November 20253372087Willow Wood, Upper Verran Road, Camberley, Surrey, GU15 2JL
- Allowed12 November 20253363491Little Trotters, Bagshot Road, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8BZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®