Mottingham Road, Ponders End, London, N9 8DZ

Planning appeal 3277739 at Mottingham Road, Ponders End, London, N9 8DZ (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 8 July 2022 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and highway safety.

15m Phase 8 Monopole complete with wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority: London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: telecoms · Change of use
Inspector: Redford R
Postcode: N9 8DZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and highway safety
Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the siting and appearance of the monopole and cabinets in a visually sensitive location was not outweighed by the need for the installation, as the appellant failed to demonstrate that this was the only suitable location and viable alternatives had not been adequately investigated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: London Plan Policy D8London Plan Policy T2London Plan Policy T3Core Strategy Policy CP30Core Strategy Policy CP25Core Strategy Policy CP24Development Management Document Policy DMD37Development Management Document Policy 47
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

242 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed27 October 20266012855
77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
Dismissed21 October 20266010541
2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
Allowed20 October 20266009773
28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
Dismissed29 September 20266010207
61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
Dismissed28 September 20266012598
21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.