Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20213277749

Meadow Farm Ruett Lane, Farrington Gurney, Bristol, BS39 6UP

Planning appeal 3277749 at Meadow Farm Ruett Lane, Farrington Gurney, Bristol, BS39 6UP (Bath and North East Somerset Council) was dismissed on 29 October 2021 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be permitted development, having regard to whether the requirements of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of paragraph Q.1(a) of the GPDO would be met.

conversion to three-bedroom dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones RE
Postcode
BS39 6UP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be permitted development, having regard to whether the requirements of Schedule 2, Part 3, Class Q of paragraph Q.1(a) of the GPDO would be met
  • Whether the extent of the building operations would be reasonably necessary to convert the building to a dwelling, having regard to the requirements of the GPDO
  • Whether or not the appeal building is suitable for conversion to a dwelling, having regard to its effect on flood risk and highway safety
  • The effect of the proposal on protected species

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the appeal building was solely used for an agricultural purpose as part of an established agricultural unit on 20 March 2013, and the extent of structural works required would exceed those reasonably necessary for conversion under Class Q of the GPDO.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NE3Policy NE5
Judgments
Hibbitt

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

20 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bath and North East Somerset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011461
    63 Newbridge Road, Bath, BA1 3HF
  2. Allowed24 September 20266010597
    43 Oriel Grove, Bath, BA2 1JE
  3. Allowed16 September 20266008719
    34 Banwell Road, Odd Down, Bath, BA2 2UJ
  4. Allowed19 August 20266005916
    Parcel 1643 Middle Piece Lane, Burnett, Keynsham, BS31 2ED
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266006951
    Pavement O/S Odeon, Kingsmead Leisure Complex, James Street West, Bath, BA1 2BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.