Planning appeal decision
Long Meadow, Bell Lane, Cocking, West Sussex, GU29 0HU
Planning appeal 3277840 at Long Meadow, Bell Lane, Cocking, West Sussex, GU29 0HU (South Downs) was dismissed on 2 December 2021 by Inspector Webb B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the developments on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area Conservation, Special Protection Area, and Ramsar Site.
erection of a single detached property with associated garaging and associated surface parking. Appeal B: APP/Y9507/W/21/3274485 Longmeadow, Bell Lane, Cocking, West Sussex GU29 0HU
- Authority
- South Downs
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Webb B
- Postcode
- GU29 0HU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the developments on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area Conservation, Special Protection Area, and Ramsar Site
- in relation to Appeal B, the effect of the development on the living conditions of occupants of 8 High Meadow with regard to outlook and privacy
- the effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the area, including the natural beauty and cultural heritage of the South Downs National Park
What decided it
Both appeals were decided by the likely adverse effect on the integrity of the Arun Valley sites through increased water abstraction, which could not be mitigated and conflicted with the Habitats Regulations and development plan policy.
The social and economic benefits of housing delivery did not outweigh the unacceptable harm to the Arun Valley sites and, in the case of Appeal B, the unacceptable harm to living conditions and character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SD9Policy SD5Policy SD1Policy SD4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 181Paragraph 180Paragraph 176
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Downs
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed14 July 20266001892Empshott Grange, Church Lane, Empshott, Hampshire, GU33 6HT
- Dismissed23 June 20266001025Roman Mile Farm, Bignor Park Road, Bignor, West Sussex, RH20 1HQ
- Dismissed28 May 20266004671Reeves Britannia, 140 The Causeway, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4LL
- Dismissed27 May 20266006395Weyridge, The Street, Binsted, Hampshire, GU34 4PF
- Dismissed11 May 2026600074417 High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2LN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®