Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 December 20213277840

Long Meadow, Bell Lane, Cocking, West Sussex, GU29 0HU

erection of a single detached property with associated garaging and associated surface parking. Appeal B: APP/Y9507/W/21/3274485 Longmeadow, Bell Lane, Cocking, West Sussex GU29 0HU

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Webb B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the developments on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area Conservation, Special Protection Area, and Ramsar Site
  • in relation to Appeal B, the effect of the development on the living conditions of occupants of 8 High Meadow with regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the area, including the natural beauty and cultural heritage of the South Downs National Park

What decided it

Both appeals were decided by the likely adverse effect on the integrity of the Arun Valley sites through increased water abstraction, which could not be mitigated and conflicted with the Habitats Regulations and development plan policy.

The social and economic benefits of housing delivery did not outweigh the unacceptable harm to the Arun Valley sites and, in the case of Appeal B, the unacceptable harm to living conditions and character and appearance.

Framework references: 181, 180, 176

Plan policies cited: Policy SD9, Policy SD5, Policy SD1, Policy SD4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.