Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed18 March 20223277858

Eastfield Stables, May Walk, Stansted, CM24 8SS

the erection of the second building of three approved under reference UTT/1282/93/FUL and a change of use from agricultural to residential and conversion to 2 no semi-detached single storey dwellings

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hartley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The building already exists with an extant agricultural approval, is surrounded by residential development, is well-screened, and would not cause harm to character and appearance, combined with the local planning authority's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

The benefits of housing delivery and the lack of a five-year housing land supply outweighed the conflict with Policy S7, as the proposal would not cause significant harm to character and appearance and would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 174, 219, 11, 105

Plan policies cited: Policy S7 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.