Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 November 20213278077

252 Anlaby Road, Kingston Upon Hull, HU3 2RS

upgrade and re-siting of existing gable wall 48 sheet advertisement to a freestanding digital 48 sheet format

Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Wilson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed advertisement on the amenity of the surrounding area, including whether it would preserve the setting and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the nearby heritage assets
  • The effect of the proposed advertisement on public safety

What decided it

The less than substantial but considerable harm to the setting of the nearby Grade II listed buildings, which would not be justified or outweighed by the extremely limited public benefits of the proposal.

The less than substantial harm to the setting of the listed buildings was weighed against the public benefits of the scheme (biodiversity net gain, air quality improvements, reduction in vehicle trips and supporting local businesses), and the harm was not outweighed by those benefits.

Framework references: 199, 200, 136

Plan policies cited: Policy 20 of the Hull Local Plan 2016 to 2032 (2017), Advertisement Design Guide: Supplementary Planning Document 8 (2019)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.