Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 October 20223278125

Rear of 58-64 Southgate Road and 58A Southgate Road , London, N1 3JF

Planning appeal 3278125 at Rear of 58-64 Southgate Road and 58A Southgate Road , London, N1 3JF (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 21 October 2022 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with respect to noise and disturbance, light, privacy, and outlook.

demolition of existing storage buildings in rear yard and erection of a part single, part two storey building for use as a day nursery (Class E). Erection of an associated infill link building between Nos. 62 – 64 and use of 58A Southgate Road as part of day nursery (Class E). Associated landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other minor developments
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
N1 3JF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with respect to noise and disturbance, light, privacy, and outlook
  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the De Beauvoir Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through noise and disturbance and would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the De Beauvoir Conservation Area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP2Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy D14Policy D3Policy HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 841 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld18 September 20263360724
    2B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
  2. Allowed17 August 20266010972
    101 Dalston Lane, London, E8 1NH
  3. Allowed14 July 20266004379
    152 Bethune Road, London, N16 5DS
  4. Dismissed14 May 20266003534
    212 Millfields Road, London, E5 0AR
  5. Dismissed12 May 20263371819
    Railway Arches 348-349 Bocking Street, Hackney, London, E8 3RU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.