Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision29 November 20213278145

341 Upper Street, London, N1 0PB

illuminated fascia signs x 2 and projecting signs x 2 and menu signs

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Senior H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed advertisements on the visual amenity of the area, including the character and appearance of The Angel Conservation Area

What decided it

The illuminated fascia and projecting signs would result in unacceptable harm to the visual amenity and character of the Angel Conservation Area, whereas the menu signs would preserve it.

The private benefits to the restaurant of the illuminated fascia and projecting signs did not outweigh the less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area, which carries great weight.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: CS8, CS9, DM2.1, DM2.3, DM2.6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.