Planning appeal decision
Hollam Farm 74 Bridge Street, Titchfield, Fareham, PO14 3QL
Planning appeal 3278200 at Hollam Farm 74 Bridge Street, Titchfield, Fareham, PO14 3QL (Fareham Borough Council) was dismissed on 10 May 2022 by Inspector Rennie S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location of the proposed dwellings is appropriate given the countryside location, distance from settlements, and relevant planning policy.
for the demolition of existing buildings and the erection of two dwellings and garages, and ecological enhancement of Hollam Farm Fields
- Authority
- Fareham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rennie S
- Postcode
- PO14 3QL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the location of the proposed dwellings is appropriate given the countryside location, distance from settlements, and relevant planning policy
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area and landscape, including the Strategic Gap
- The effect of the development on the integrity and qualities of ecological designated sites
- Whether the proposal can provide a biodiversity net gain/enhancement
What decided it
The significant adverse impact on the rural character and openness of the countryside, which would not be sufficiently mitigated by landscaping and would fail to minimise adverse impacts on the countryside as required by policy DSP40 criterion (iii), means the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of two dwellings even under the tilted balance.
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the rural area and the failure to minimise adverse impacts on the countryside outweighed the limited benefits of two dwellings towards housing supply, biodiversity enhancements, and economic benefits, even when assessed against the Framework policies taken as a whole under the tilted balance triggered by the five-year housing land supply shortfall.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS14Policy DSP6Policy CS2Policy CS6Policy DSP40Policy CS22Policy CS17Policy DSP15Policy CS4Policy DSP2Policy DSP13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 174
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Fareham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed28 September 2026601165624 Osborn Road, Fareham, PO16 7DQ
- Dismissed12 August 20266006140Land West of Daisy Cottage, Brook Avenue, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9HP
- Dismissed27 July 20266004772Land At Old Street Fareham, Stubbington, PO14 3HW
- Dismissed16 July 20263372146Rivermead, Spurlings Road, Fareham, PO17 6AA
- Notice varied and upheld7 May 2026335178876 Moody Road, Fareham, PO14 2BX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®