Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 February 20223278223

Sidings Street, Olympic Park, London, E20 2AD

a 20m phase 8 monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
London Legacy Development Corporation
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Castle S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for it to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The absence of a feasible and practical site elsewhere that would provide the required coverage means that the need for the installation to be sited as proposed outweighs the limited harm to character and appearance.

Framework references: 117

Plan policies cited: LP Policy BN 1, LP Policy S.6, London Plan Policy SI 6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.