Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20213278410

Unit 4 Regency Wharf, Broad Street, Birmingham, B1 2DS

a Non illuminated background panel, with face and halo built up illuminated letters with tag line illuminated from behind

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Sutton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the advertisement on the visual amenity of the area

What decided it

The excessively large sign would overwhelm the building's elevation at street level and appear incongruous and out of keeping with the character of the prominent location.

Framework references: 136

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan, Paragraph 3.14D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan, Policy DM7 of the publication version of the emerging Birmingham Plan (2019)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.