Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 October 20213278503

31 Hare Park Avenue, LIVERSEDGE, WF15 8DN

gates put between existing pillars and extended at the same level with a wall and fence on top

Authority
Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the locality

What decided it

The substantial enclosure of the frontage by high boundary treatments incorporating alien panel materials causes harm to the character and appearance of the locality by introducing an incongruous and dominant feature that conflicts with the consistent open frontages characteristic of the street.

The benefits to the appellant of security, privacy and prevention of dog fouling were outweighed by the harm to the character and appearance of the locality and the conflict with development plan policy.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP24

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.