Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 November 20213278593

18A Rutland Road, ILFORD, IG1 1EN

roof extension including hip to gable and rear dormer extensions

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Jones M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • for both appeals, the effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the area
  • solely in relation to Appeal B, whether or not adequate living conditions would be created for existing and future users

What decided it

In Appeal A, the unacceptable effect on character and appearance caused by the loss of the hipped roof feature and the obtrusive dormer arrangement; in Appeal B, the failure to create adequate living conditions due to an undersized kitchen and bedrooms with extremely limited outlook.

The modest benefits of additional accommodation and improved housing mix were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance in Appeal A and the failure to create adequate living conditions in Appeal B.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP26, Policy LP30, Policy LP7, Policy LP29, Policy 3.5 of the London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.