Planning appeal decision
Land to the West of the A131, Braintree, CM7 5NU
Planning appeal 3278620 at Land to the West of the A131, Braintree, CM7 5NU (Braintree District Council) was dismissed on 21 December 2021 by Inspector Hendley D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing with regard to development plan policy and national planning policy.
an outline planning application (some matters reserved) for the residential development of up to 37 dwellings (including 40% affordable housing), with vehicular access, areas of landscaping and public open space
- Authority
- Braintree District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hendley D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing with regard to development plan policy and national planning policy
- the accessibility to local services
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- housing land supply matters
- if harm arises, whether this would be outweighed by the benefits of the proposal
What decided it
The combined harm from the unsuitable location and unacceptable accessibility to local services was found to be very significant and was not outweighed by the housing, affordable housing and other benefits, even under the tilted balance.
The adverse impacts of the proposal (unsuitable location, poor accessibility, limited landscape/visual harm), found to be very significant, were held to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the significant benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing and economic benefits, so the tilted balance did not favour granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy RLP90Policy LPP55Policy SP3Policy RLP2Policy CS5Policy LPP1Policy RLP53Policy CS7Policy LPP44Policy RLP80Policy CS8Policy LPP71Policy CS2Policy SP4Policy LPP72
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 74Paragraph 105Paragraph 110Paragraph 112Paragraph 174Paragraph 81Paragraph 202Paragraph 57Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Canterbury City Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2019] EWCA Civ 669; Bassetlaw District Council v Secretary of State for Housing [2019] EWHC 556 (Admin); Mordue v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and others [2015] EWCA Civ 1243
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Braintree District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed24 August 20266009868The Grannex at Paddock Cottage, Cranes Lane, Kelvedon, C05 9AY
- Dismissed19 June 20266006010Unit 2 Greenfields Farm, Great Yeldham Road, Stambourne, CO9 4ND
- Dismissed3 December 20253365443Prested Hall, Prested Hall Chase, Feering, CO5 9EE
- Dismissed5 September 20253358626Land Opposite Dearsley Farm, Kedington Road, Sturmer, Essex, CB9 7XR
- Allowed1 August 20253359441Land at Cranes Lane, Kelvedon, Essex, CO5 9AX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®