Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 February 20223278653

Height Side Farm Todmorden Road, Bacup, OL13 9UG

Planning appeal 3278653 at Height Side Farm Todmorden Road, Bacup, OL13 9UG (Lancashire County Council) was dismissed on 4 February 2022 by Inspector Martinson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of new building and formation of hardstanding area for use as a site for the sorting and recycling of skip waste

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
minerals-waste · Other minor developments
Inspector
Martinson P
Postcode
OL13 9UG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan and the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the users of the access road, a public right of way

What decided it

The proposal would result in unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the rural area and would not enhance rural character as required by Policies RD2 and LT6, and there was no evidence demonstrating an operational need for the development to be located in the countryside rather than an urban industrial unit.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS7Policy WM3Policy DM2Policy EMP1Policy SD2Policy LT6Policy RD2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 100

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Lancashire County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed26 August 20266002168
    Mytax Farm, 4 Bourbles Lane, Poulton-Le-Fylde, FY6 0PE
  2. Invalid17 June 20263368651
    Highcroft, Highfield Road, Croston, Leyland, PR26 9HH
  3. Notice varied and upheld31 March 20263332630
    Land of Finnington Lane, Hoghton, Chorley, PR5 0SP
  4. Allowed9 March 20263375424
    Land Adjacent to Wigan Lane,, Heath Charnock, Adlington, Chorley, Lancashire, PR7 4JT
  5. Unknown3 March 20263348617
    Appeal 3348617

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.