Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 October 20213278741

8 Ranmoor Gardens, Sheffield, S10 3FR

Planning appeal 3278741 at 8 Ranmoor Gardens, Sheffield, S10 3FR (Sheffield City Council) was dismissed on 19 October 2021 by Inspector Harrison N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ranmoor Conservation Area.

Garage extension to frontage, internal alterations, and conversion of existing garage to dining room

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Harrison N
Postcode
S10 3FR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ranmoor Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties with regard to privacy
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the conservation area with no public benefits to outweigh it, and would also cause unacceptable overlooking and highway safety harm.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area, combined with harm to living conditions and highway safety, was not outweighed by any public benefits, as the private benefit to the appellant of improved garage parking carried no weight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H14Policy BE5Policy BE16Policy BE17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

117 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266014327
    4 Struan Road, Sheffield, S7 2EH
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009090
    Meadow Farm, Whiteley Wood Road, Sheffield, S11 7TJ
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266014347
    Advertising Right Adjacent Park House, Bernard Road, Sheffield, S2 5BQ
  4. Allowed16 October 20266014719
    1 Twickenham Court, Halfway, Sheffield, S20 4HT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266012829
    189 Crimicar Lane, Sheffield, S10 4EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.