Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 April 20223278957

Gooshays Drive, Harold Hill, Romford, RM3 8YJ

Planning appeal 3278957 at Gooshays Drive, Harold Hill, Romford, RM3 8YJ (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 19 April 2022 by Inspector Simpson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.

described on the application form as: ‘Proposed 15m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wraparound cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Simpson L
Postcode
RM3 8YJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The appellant did not adequately demonstrate that the proposed development needed to be sited at this particular location, having failed to properly assess alternative sites and existing structures, such that the significant harm to character and appearance was not outweighed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy SI6Local Plan Policy 25Local Plan Policy 26
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

191 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed11 January 20233288716
    Hornchurch Road, London Borough of Havering, London, RM11 1PZ
  2. Allowed21 December 20223296972
    Highways Land, Hall Lane, Upminster, Essex, RM14 1AU
  3. Dismissed30 November 20223291538
    Wingletye Lane, Hornchurch, London Borough of Havering, London, RM11 3AR
  4. Allowed16 November 20223285473
    Land Opposite Claydon Court, Upper Rainham Road, Havering, London, RM12 4PA
  5. Allowed24 May 20223276690
    South End Road, South Hornchurch, Rainham, RM13 7BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.