Planning appeal decision
Penny Fiddle, Betsy Lane, Bransgore, Christchurch, BH23 8AQ
Planning appeal 3279106 at Penny Fiddle, Betsy Lane, Bransgore, Christchurch, BH23 8AQ (New Forest District Council) was dismissed on 15 December 2021 by Inspector Nicholls H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effects of the proposal on the living conditions of future holiday guests, neighbouring occupiers within the host dwelling and at 'Thatch View', Nos 6 and 7 Canute Drive and 'Merleswood', with particular regard to privacy, noise and disturbance.
use of wooden garden cabin for holiday let (Retrospective)
- Authority
- New Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
- Postcode
- BH23 8AQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effects of the proposal on the living conditions of future holiday guests, neighbouring occupiers within the host dwelling and at 'Thatch View', Nos 6 and 7 Canute Drive and 'Merleswood', with particular regard to privacy, noise and disturbance
- the effects of the proposal on the holiday guests and the occupiers of the host dwelling in terms of the adequacy of the respective garden areas
- whether the location of the site accords with local and national policies that seek to permit new development in areas that are at the lowest risk of flooding unless no other sequentially preferable sites are available
- the effect of the proposal on protected trees
- the effect of the proposal on the New Forest Special Area of Conservation, the New Forest Special Protection Area, the New Forest Ramsar site, the Solent and Southampton Water Special Protection Area, the Solent and Southampton Water Ramsar site, and the Solent Maritime Special Area of Conservation
What decided it
The identified harm to the living conditions of occupiers of the host dwelling and neighbouring properties through privacy, noise and disturbance, combined with the failure to accord with flood risk policy and the absence of mitigation for protected sites, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan when taken as a whole.
The economic benefits to local businesses and the site's accessibility to facilities were outweighed by the harm to living conditions, poor design through garden curtailment, flood risk policy conflict, and unmitigated impacts on protected sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV3Policy CCC1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 161Paragraph 162
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in New Forest District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed26 February 20266000591Provost Bungalow, Rockbourne, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, SP6 3NR
- Allowed14 November 2024333850312-14 Langdown Lawn, Hythe, Southampton, SO45 5GR
- Dismissed23 August 20243329460Rycroft Crow Lane, Crow, Ringwood, BH24 3DZ
- Allowed16 January 20243324227Orchard Gate Noads Way, Dibden Purlieu, Southampton, SO45 4PD
- Notice varied and upheld27 July 20233307656Land at Arnewood Lodge, 223 Everton Road, Hordle, SO41 0HE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®