Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 March 20223279175

20 Leyburn Road, Edmonton, LONDON, N18 2BE

conversion of the house into a 6 room HMO with part 2-storey rear extension and loft conversion and conversion of garage into a habitable room

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Philpott M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for the future occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance and the provision of private amenity space
  • the effect of the proposal on parking, highway safety and the free flow of traffic, including whether satisfactory waste and recycling servicing arrangements would be provided and sustainable transport would be prioritised
  • whether the proposal would make provision for sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) measures

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area due to the roof dormer's non-compliance with design standards and awkward positioning relative to the double storey rear projection, conflicting with development plan policies and the Framework.

Framework references: 12, 14, 9

Plan policies cited: DMD13, DMD37, CP30, D4, D1, DMD5, DMD8, CP4, CP32, D6, D14, DMD9, T6.1, DMD45, DMD47, DMD48, CP24, CP25, T4, T5, T6, T7, DMD60, DMD61, SI12, SI13, H10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.