Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20213279308

11 FLORIS PLACE, LONDON, SW4 0HH

Erection of an external balustrade on an existing flat roof above the kitchen to the rear 11 Floris Place. A balustrade will be erected around the edge of the roofed area and slip-proof wooden flooring installed to allow the roofed area to be used as an aerobic exercise area for a disabled resident of the property. The balustrade design will be in keeping with existing balconies on other Floris Place properties and with the existing Juliette balcony at the front of 11 Floris Place

Authority
London Borough of Lambeth
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Thompson P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers in Floris Place, Rectory Gardens and Rozel Road, with regard to overlooking and noise and disturbance
  • the character and appearance of the existing row of dwellings and its surroundings

What decided it

The significantly detrimental effect on the living conditions of occupiers of 10 and 12 Floris Place through overlooking outweighed the personal circumstances and health benefits to the appellant's disabled son.

The personal circumstances and health benefits to the disabled resident were outweighed by the significantly detrimental effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 10 and 12 Floris Place through overlooking.

Plan policies cited: Policy Q2, Policy Q5, Policy Q11, Policy H5

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.