Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 March 20223279455

Matilda Apartments, 4 Earnshaw Street, London, WC2H 8AJ

the installation of 6 no. antenna apertures, 2 no. transmission dishes and 8 no. equipment cabinets on the roof of the building and development ancillary thereto

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Underwood G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the development is permitted development under the terms of the GPDO
  • If it is permitted development, the effect the siting and appearance of the development would have on the character and appearance of the area including the significance of designated heritage assets

What decided it

The proposed development was restricted by conditions 8 and 10 of the original planning permission which required prior written consent of the Council for attachments and equipment, and no such consent had been obtained, therefore the development did not benefit from permitted development rights under the GPDO.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.