Planning appeal decision
Central Reservation of Aigburth Road (Opposite Belgrave Road) , Liverpool, L17 4LF
Planning appeal 3279581 at Central Reservation of Aigburth Road (Opposite Belgrave Road) , Liverpool, L17 4LF (Liverpool City Council) was dismissed on 18 November 2021 by Inspector Caine M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the siting and appearance of the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Lark Lane Conservation Area.
the installation of an 18 metre high monopole supporting 6 no. antennas and 2 no. transmission dishes, 4 no. equipment cabinets and development works ancillary thereto
- Authority
- Liverpool City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Caine M
- Postcode
- L17 4LF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the siting and appearance of the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Lark Lane Conservation Area
- In the event of any harm to the significance of designated heritage asset being found, whether or not this would be outweighed by the need for the installation in the proposed location, the lack of less harmful alternative sites, and the proposal's public benefits
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that less harmful alternatives had been adequately explored, combined with the significant less-than-substantial harm to the Conservation Area, meant the public benefits carried insufficient weight to outweigh the heritage harm.
The less than substantial but significant harm to the designated heritage asset was not outweighed by the public benefits of enhanced 5G connectivity and network capacity, as the appellant had not adequately demonstrated that the benefits could not be achieved through redevelopment of the approved alternative mast site.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved UDP Policy HD11Saved UDP Policy HD27Emerging Plan Policy STP5Emerging Plan Policy HD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 201Paragraph 202Paragraph 117
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Liverpool City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed19 October 20266010482Pavement O/S 12 Utting Avenue East, Liverpool, L11 1DQ
- Allowed9 October 20266010480Pavement O/S 12 Utting Avenue East, Liverpool, L11 1DQ
- Dismissed8 October 20266010521Seeds Lane, Orrell Park, Liverpool, L9 0PG
- Allowed10 September 20266009242Pavement O/S Esso, East Lancashire Road, Liverpool, L11 2FT
- Allowed10 September 20266009241Pavement O/S Esso, East Lancashire Road, Liverpool, L11 2FT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®