Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 December 20213279765

Canalside Farm, Wood Lane East, Adlington, Cheshire, SK10 4PH

change of use to open a petting farm and café, and a residential lodge under the caravan act 1968 legislation

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Caine M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and development plan policy
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Macclesfield Canal Conservation Area and the setting of Canal Bridge 18, which is a Grade II listed building
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The substantial weight given to harm to Green Belt openness and the failure of limited public benefits to outweigh less than substantial but significant harm to designated heritage assets meant very special circumstances were not established.

The harm to Green Belt openness and heritage assets was not outweighed by the limited educational, therapeutic and wellbeing benefits claimed, which lacked substantive supporting evidence from relevant organisations.

Framework references: 138, 149, 150, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy GC1, Policy PG 3, Policy SE 1, Policy SD 2, Policy SE 5, Policy SE 7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.