Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 April 20223280096

80 Glenville Road, Christchurch, BH23 5PY

Planning appeal 3280096 at 80 Glenville Road, Christchurch, BH23 5PY (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 13 April 2022 by Inspector Webb B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the integrity of habitats sites.

sever the land to the rear of Nos. 80 and 82. Demolition of existing property No. 84 and construction of 5 x 3 bed dwellings and 1 x 4 bed dwelling with associated access and parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Webb B
Postcode
BH23 5PY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the integrity of habitats sites
  • whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants in relation to noise and outlook

What decided it

The development would have a likely adverse effect on the integrity of the habitats sites in the absence of properly secured mitigation, contrary to Policy ME2 and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.

The social and economic benefits of 5 additional housing units in an accessible location, including contribution to the Council's housing shortfall, were clearly outweighed by the adverse environmental effects on the integrity of habitats sites.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ME2 of the Christchurch and East Dorset Local Plan Part 1 – Core Strategy 2014saved Policy H12 of the Christchurch Local Plan 2001Policy HE2 of the Core Strategy
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 182

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

62 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed14 October 20266011383
    41 Shillito Road, Poole, BH12 2BW
  2. Allowed8 October 20266006178
    55 Highfield Road, Bournemouth, BH9 2SE
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266007836
    65a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
  4. Allowed28 September 20266007175
    281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
  5. Allowed24 September 20266007187
    5 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.