Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld8 November 20223280157

50 Fulready Road, Leyton, London, E10 6DU

Planning appeal 3280157 at 50 Fulready Road, Leyton, London, E10 6DU (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 8 November 2022 by Inspector Walker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the loss of a larger home.

without planning permission: The material change of use of the Land from single family dwellinghouse (Use Class C3) to three self-contained flats (Use Class C3). The associated building works to convert the Land from a single family dwellinghouse to three self-contained residential flats

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Walker A
Postcode
E10 6DU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the loss of a larger home
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of current and future occupiers as regards noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the development on the level of waste created
  • whether or not there is sufficient parking provision for occupiers of the development

What decided it

The loss of a larger family-sized home (3+ bedrooms) in an area where such accommodation is particularly required, combined with the creation of sub-standard smaller units that fail to meet minimum space standards, constitutes significant harm that is not outweighed by other considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM5Policy DM6Policy DM7Policy CS2Policy CS13Policy D6Policy CS15Policy DM16Policy 20
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 48Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

594 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266011324
    L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
  3. Dismissed18 September 20266011375
    Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
  4. Dismissed30 July 20266008789
    200 202 Billet Road, Walthamstow, E17 5DX
  5. Allowed21 July 20266006927
    8 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.