Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 March 20223280727

315A Brockley Road, London, SE4 2QZ

Planning appeal 3280727 at 315A Brockley Road, London, SE4 2QZ (London Borough of Lewisham) was dismissed on 15 March 2022 by Inspector MacLeod R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building, the surrounding area and on a conservation area in relation to its scale, design and materials.

single storey building for use as storage/office space

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
MacLeod R
Postcode
SE4 2QZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building, the surrounding area and on a conservation area in relation to its scale, design and materials

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area arising from the building's scale, design and materials, combined with its poor relationship to the frontage terrace, outweighed the modest public benefits of the proposed storage and office use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HC1 of the London Plan (2021)Policy 15 of the Lewisham Core Strategy (2011)Policy 16 of the Lewisham Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM30 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan (2014)Policy DM33 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan (2014)Policy DM36 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan (2014)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

518 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lewisham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed23 October 20266013784
    58a Manor Park, Hither Green, London, SE13 5RL
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266011958
    Plot to the Rear of 4 Wickham Road, Wickham Mews, London, SE4 1PS
  3. Allowed24 September 20266014022
    30 Horncastle Road, Lee, London, SE12 9LA
  4. Dismissed11 September 20266009541
    32, Bromley Road, London, SE6 2TP
  5. Allowed11 September 20266004929
    1 - 3A Doggett Road, London, SE6 4PZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.