Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision8 March 20223280733

67 Codicote Road, WELWYN, AL6 9TY

a ground floor extensions to front and rear, first floor extension to front, loft conversion with new gables to front and rear and raised roof, and a detached garage and gym building following demolition of the existing car port

Authority
North Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Woodwards O

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed extensions to the house would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the extensions are considered to be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' necessary to justify them

What decided it

The proposed house extensions constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness, and the minor private benefit to occupiers does not clearly outweigh this harm, so very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 137, 138, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy 2 of the District Local Plan No.2 with Alterations Originally adopted April 1996, Saved Policies Written Statement dated September 2007, emerging Policy SP5 of the Local Plan 2011 – 2031 Proposed Submission, dated October 2016

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.