Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld29 December 20213280763

Sandford Mill Sandford Lane, Woodley, READING, RG5 4TB

raised lawn to residential garden and new splayed close boarded fence and replacement gates

Authority
Wokingham Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hand S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged already benefit from planning permission (ground c)
  • Whether planning permission should be granted for the hardstanding, fencing and gates (ground a and s78 appeal)
  • Whether the requirements of the enforcement notice are reasonable (grounds f and g)

What decided it

The absence of a required Flood Risk Assessment for development in Flood Zone 3a, as mandated by NPPF footnote 50, was the sole reason for dismissing the appeals despite finding no other material harm.

No balancing exercise was undertaken; the decision turned on a mandatory procedural requirement (FRA) rather than a weighing of competing considerations.

Framework references: 163, 164

Plan policies cited: CP11, CP1, CP3, CC03

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.