Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 March 20223280966

Rushbrook Mill Paper Mill Lane, Bramford, Ipswich, IP8 4BF

Planning appeal 3280966 at Rushbrook Mill Paper Mill Lane, Bramford, Ipswich, IP8 4BF (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 17 March 2022 by Inspector Down K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed office building on sustainable development objectives, including sustainable transport, in the rural area.

the erection of an office building of 666 sqm

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Down K
Postcode
IP8 4BF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed office building on sustainable development objectives, including sustainable transport, in the rural area
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety with respect to car parking provision and visibility at the proposed access
  • The effect of the proposed development on flood risk with respect to the resistance and resilience to flooding of the office building

What decided it

The proposed development failed on all three main issues: it was unsustainable in a rural location lacking public transport, it would create material parking stress and highway safety concerns, and it had not been subject to the required sequential flood risk test with unresolved concerns about flood resistance and resilience.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy E9Policy E10Policy FC3Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy T9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 89Paragraph 84Paragraph 85Paragraph 111Paragraph 159Paragraph 160Paragraph 161Paragraph 162Paragraph 163

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed5 August 20266007731
    Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
  2. Notice upheld12 March 20263357418
    Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
  3. Allowed11 July 20253354473
    Camping Site And Premises Sudbourne Hall Farm, Mill Road, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SE
  4. Dismissed28 April 20253358559
    Post Office, 7 Church Street, Eye, IP23 7BD
  5. Allowed25 April 20253355479
    2 Thorney Green Road, Stowupland, Stowmarket, IP14 4BY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.