Planning appeal decision
1 Larch Mews, Woodmill Road, Hackney, London, E5 9GN
Planning appeal 3281091 at 1 Larch Mews, Woodmill Road, Hackney, London, E5 9GN (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 14 March 2022 by Inspector Satheesan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity.
Without planning permission the installation of a large outbuilding in the garden area of the property
- Authority
- London Borough of Hackney
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Satheesan R
- Postcode
- E5 9GN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity
What decided it
The enforcement notice's requirement to remove the outbuilding is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control, and no lesser steps would achieve this purpose.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hackney
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Notice upheld23 September 20263368635Flat 6, Brooks Lodge, 194A Hoxton Street, London, N1 5HU
- Notice varied and upheld18 September 202633607242B Woodberry Down, Hackney, London, N4 2TG
- Dismissed14 May 20266003534212 Millfields Road, London, E5 0AR
- Notice upheld27 March 2026333760072 Powerscroft Road, Hackney, London, E5 0PP
- Notice upheld27 March 2026333759974 Powerscroft Road, Hackney, London, E5 0PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®