Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 December 20213281144

154 Common Lane, Sheldon, BIRMINGHAM, B26 3DN

proposed demolition of existing metal clad and framed building and the erection of 2 No. bungalows (semi-detached)

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Walmsley R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposal on local biodiversity

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, highway safety, and biodiversity, combined with the absence of material considerations to outweigh the development plan conflict, resulted in dismissal.

The limited benefits of housing provision and site remediation did not outweigh the harm to character and appearance, living conditions, highway safety and biodiversity.

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy TP27, Policy TP30, Policy TP8, Policy TP44, Birmingham Development Plan (2017), saved paragraph 3.14C-D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan (2005), saved paragraph 3.38 of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan (2005), Places for Living SPG (2001), Places for All SPG (2001), 45 Degree Code Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG 2006)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.