Planning appeal decision
154 Common Lane, Sheldon, Birmingham, B26 3DN
Planning appeal 3281144 at 154 Common Lane, Sheldon, Birmingham, B26 3DN (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 15 December 2021 by Inspector Walmsley R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
proposed demolition of existing metal clad and framed building and the erection of 2 No. bungalows (semi-detached)
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Walmsley R
- Postcode
- B26 3DN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- the effect of the proposal on local biodiversity
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, highway safety, and biodiversity, combined with the absence of material considerations to outweigh the development plan conflict, resulted in dismissal.
The limited benefits of housing provision and site remediation did not outweigh the harm to character and appearance, living conditions, highway safety and biodiversity.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy TP27Policy TP30Policy TP8Policy TP44Birmingham Development Plan (2017)saved paragraph 3.14C-D of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan (2005)saved paragraph 3.38 of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan (2005)Places for Living SPG (2001)Places for All SPG (2001)45 Degree Code Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG 2006)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed1 April 2026600481382 Hollie Lucas Road, Birmingham, B13 0QN
- Allowed21 January 202633740009 Dorset Road, Harborne, Birmingham, B17 8EN
- Allowed20 March 20253356275173-175 Soho Road, Birmingham, B21 9SU
- Dismissed26 February 2025335702121 St. Peters Road, Harborne, Birmingham, B17 0AT
- Allowed10 October 2024334667929 Hubert Croft, Selly Oak, Birmingham, B29 6DU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®