Pilgrims, Pilgrims Lane, Chilham, Canterbury, Kent, CT4 8AA

Planning appeal 3281266 at Pilgrims, Pilgrims Lane, Chilham, Canterbury, Kent, CT4 8AA (Ashford Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 August 2022 by Inspector Smith D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to relevant development plan policies.

the erection of detached 4-5 bedroom live-work dwelling and detached double-garage (with all matters reserved)

Authority: Ashford Borough Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Smith D
Postcode: CT4 8AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to relevant development plan policies

What decided it

The proposal's failure to comply with Policy HOU5 criteria b) and d) because the site is not within easy walking distance of basic day-to-day services and is not located where it is possible to maximise the use of public transport, cycling and walking.

The adverse impacts of the proposal, particularly the conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy and lack of sustainable location, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing delivery in a borough with a below-target housing supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy HOU5
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 80

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed29 October 20266007592
Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
Dismissed26 October 20266009946
Daniel Farm, Smarden Bell Road, Pluckley, TN27 0SY
Dismissed8 October 20266012673
Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
Dismissed30 September 20266011717
4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
Dismissed30 September 20266011714
4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.