Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 April 20223281286

Land at Rear of Nos. 25 & 27 High Street, Ropsley, Grantham, Lincolnshire, NG33 4BG

Planning appeal 3281286 at Land at Rear of Nos. 25 & 27 High Street, Ropsley, Grantham, Lincolnshire, NG33 4BG (South Kesteven District Council) was dismissed on 20 April 2022 by Inspector Woodward M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to local policies relating to the spatial strategy and settlement hierarchy, and the effect on the character and appearance of the Ropsley Conservation Area.

residential development (outline)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Woodward M
Postcode
NG33 4BG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the appeal site would be a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to local policies relating to the spatial strategy and settlement hierarchy, and the effect on the character and appearance of the Ropsley Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the Ropsley Conservation Area and conflict with Policy SP3 by locating the majority of development on open rear garden space outside the main built-up part of the settlement, with public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy SP4Policy DE1Policy EN6Policy R&D2Policy R&D7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 124

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

1 other decided appeal within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Kesteven

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed13 October 20266013421
    3 Drummond Road, Bourne, PE10 9JF
  2. Allowed6 October 20266012310
    Land Off Brambling Walk, Rippingale, Bourne, PE10 0WB
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266008915
    Land North Of Claypole Equestrian, Doddington Lane, Claypole, Newark, NG23 5AT
  4. Dismissed25 September 20266011227
    Land West of The Charters, Greatford Road, Uffington, Stamford, PE9 4UD
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266010911
    Beechwood House, Willoughby Road, West Willoughby, NG32 3SN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.