Planning appeal decision
The Cart Overthrown Public House, 434 Montagu Road, London, N9 0ER
Planning appeal 3281393 at The Cart Overthrown Public House, 434 Montagu Road, London, N9 0ER (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 13 July 2022 by Inspector Wallis D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character.
Redevelopment of site and erection of part-5, 7 and part- 8 storey block of 61 Self-contained flats comprising (10 x 1 bed, 18 x 2 bed, 26 x 3 bed and 7 x 4 bed) involving balconies together with 1 x ground floor commercial unit (A4 use), ground floor parking, new access, landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wallis D
- Postcode
- N9 0ER
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including landscape character
- the effect of the development upon highway network
- whether or not sufficient affordable housing would be provided
What decided it
The proposal's compliance with the most up-to-date development plan policies (London Plan 2021) on character and appearance, highway safety, and affordable housing, combined with the legal agreement securing the necessary affordable housing quantum, justified allowing the appeal.
The benefits of residential development and regeneration of the site, combined with the provision of 35% affordable housing and a ground floor drinking establishment to replace the lost public house use, outweighed any concerns about the scale and massing of the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- London Plan 2021 Policy D3London Plan 2021 Policy D4London Plan 2021 Policy D6London Plan 2021 Policy G5London Plan 2021 Policy G7London Plan 2021 Policy H5London Plan 2021 Policy T4London Plan 2021 Policy T6Enfield Core Strategy 2010 Policy CP3Enfield Core Strategy 2010 Policy CP4Enfield Core Strategy 2010 Policy CP25Enfield Core Strategy 2010 Policy CP30Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD1Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD6Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD8Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD9Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD37Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD45Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD47Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD73Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD80Enfield Development Management Document 2014 Policy DMD81
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®