Planning appeal decision
Hillcrest, Abson Road, Pucklechurch, BS16 9SD
Planning appeal 3281438 at Hillcrest, Abson Road, Pucklechurch, BS16 9SD (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 2 March 2022 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) and any relevant development plan policies.
erection of 15 No. affordable housing units (outline) with all matters reserved
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones RE
- Postcode
- BS16 9SD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on openness and the purposes of including land within the Green Belt
- whether the location is suitable for dwellings having regard to policies restricting development in the countryside
- whether the proposal makes adequate provision toward infrastructure, with particular reference to affordable housing and open space
- if the proposal is inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal fails to meet the exceptions policy requirements for rural affordable housing (being neither limited nor modest in scale, lacking Parish Council support and evidence of local need) and therefore constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt for which no very special circumstances exist.
The moderate weight of benefits (accessibility, economic benefits, electric charging points) does not clearly outweigh the substantial weight given to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, the moderate harm to openness, significant encroachment into countryside, and failure to accord with the development plan's locational strategy.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS4APolicy CS5Policy CS19Policy CS34Policy CS6Policy CS24Policy PSP7Policy PSP40
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 137
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed13 October 20266010963Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
- Dismissed13 October 20266009931Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY
- Planning permission granted4 September 20263378284Land Adjacent to Orchard Farm Cottage, Pomphrey Hill, Mangotsfield, Bristol, BS16 9NF
- Planning permission granted17 August 20263378286Land At Northwick Road, Pilning, Bristol, BS35 4LX
- Dismissed13 July 20266006492Long Acre Farm, Dodington Lane, Dodington, BS37 6SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®