Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 April 20223281530

23a Ravenshaw Street, London, NW6 1NP

Planning appeal 3281530 at 23a Ravenshaw Street, London, NW6 1NP (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 20 April 2022 by Inspector Stephens K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

The development involves the demolition of an existing late Victorian end of terrace house (2 flats of GIA 69.7m² and 94.5m²) with an accompanying car park and erection of a three stories plus basement level 7 unit apartment block comprising 4 x 3 Bed units and 3 x 2 Bed units. All flats would have access to private and communal amenity space. No on-site parking is provided and the development would be 100% car free

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Stephens K
Postcode
NW6 1NP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the site would be a suitable location for basement flats with regard to flooding
  • Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing

What decided it

The design of the building, particularly the rear elevation, would harm the character and appearance of the area and be a lasting blight on the local area, which outweighs the benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy 2 of the Fortune Green & West Hampstead Neighbourhood PlanLocal Plan Policy CC3Local Plan Policy A5Local Plan Policy H4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 832 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.