Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 January 20223281637

Land o/s Othellos Restaurant, Gateacre Park Drive, Liverpool, L25 1PD

Telecommunications Equipment. 19metre pole - galvanised steel, 1no. APM5930 cabinet 1900 mm x (D) 600 mm x (W) 1752 mm (H), 1no BOWLER cabinet600 mm (D) x 600 mm (W) x 1200 mm (H), 1no Wrap around cabinet 1800mm (D) x 700mm (W) 1560 mm (H), 1no. BATSMAN cabinet 600 mm (D) x 500mm (W) x 1585 (H)

Authority
Liverpool City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Caine M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance caused by the excessive height and bulk of the proposed monopole, combined with the failure to demonstrate that public benefits could not be achieved at alternative locations with less visual harm, outweighed the telecommunications and economic benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 48, 117

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy HD27 of The City of Liverpool Unitary Development Plan (2002), Policy STP1 of the Emerging Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.