Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 March 20223282180

78 Windmill Road, LONDON, N18 1LN

subdivision of site and erection of an end-of-terrace 2-storey 3 bedroom dwelling house with refuse and recycling bins

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Philpott M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory standard of living accommodation for future users of the bedroom in the roof space in respect of daylight, sunlight and outlook
  • whether the proposal would be satisfactory in respect of flood risk from surface water and make adequate provision for sustainable drainage

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area, caused by disrupting the cohesive appearance and rhythm of the row of semi-detached properties and undermining the spacious character of Orpington Gardens, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest benefits of delivering a single new family-sized dwelling.

The modest housing benefits and contribution to housing delivery were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 12, 14, 130

Plan policies cited: DMD6, DMD37, DMD38, CP4, CP30, GG2, D3, D4, DMD13, DMD14, H2, DMD8, CP5, H1, H10, DMD61, CP21, SI13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.