Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 March 20223282180

78 Windmill Road, London, N18 1LN

Planning appeal 3282180 at 78 Windmill Road, London, N18 1LN (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 1 March 2022 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

subdivision of site and erection of an end-of-terrace 2-storey 3 bedroom dwelling house with refuse and recycling bins

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Philpott M
Postcode
N18 1LN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory standard of living accommodation for future users of the bedroom in the roof space in respect of daylight, sunlight and outlook
  • whether the proposal would be satisfactory in respect of flood risk from surface water and make adequate provision for sustainable drainage

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area, caused by disrupting the cohesive appearance and rhythm of the row of semi-detached properties and undermining the spacious character of Orpington Gardens, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the modest benefits of delivering a single new family-sized dwelling.

The modest housing benefits and contribution to housing delivery were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DMD6DMD37DMD38CP4CP30GG2D3D4DMD13DMD14H2DMD8CP5H1H10DMD61CP21SI13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 14Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

423 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed7 May 20263336102
    70 Sketty Road, Enfield, EN1 3SF
  2. Allowed24 March 20266003066
    45 Park Road, Enfield, EN3 6SP
  3. Dismissed23 March 20263375785
    5 Cocker Road, Enfield, London, EN1 4QQ
  4. Dismissed17 March 20266003971
    5 Ramscroft Close, London, N9 9JY
  5. Allowed10 March 20266004174
    256 Bury Street West, London, N9 9LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.