Brookfield Lodge Datchet Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PS

Planning appeal 3282347 at Brookfield Lodge Datchet Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PS (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 12 July 2022 by Inspector Cliff D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies.

glazed link between existing cottage and summer room

Authority: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type: householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: other · Householder developments
Inspector: Cliff D
Postcode: SL3 9PS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies
Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, 'Brookfield, Datchet Road' (Ref: 1319361), and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
The effect upon the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the special historic interest of the Grade II listed building and would not satisfy the requirements of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, paragraph 197 of the Framework, and Policies HE1 and QP1 of the Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy QP5Policy QP3Policy HE1Policy QP1
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 149Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

53 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Allowed27 October 20266007126
Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
Allowed26 October 20266014376
Roseland, High Road, Cookham, Maidenhead, SL6 9JS
Dismissed21 October 20266009694
Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
Dismissed9 October 20266009005
59 to 61 and Land to the Rear of 59 to 61 St Leonard's Road, Windsor, SL4 3BX
Notice upheld24 September 20263353235
Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.