Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20223282393

Land north of Kia-Ora, 64 Lymington Bottom, Four Marks, Hampshire, GU34 5AH

Erection of detached house and integral garage with car parking and new access

Authority
East Hampshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Szymanski D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, including upon protected trees
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers of the proposed dwelling with particular reference to daylight
  • the effect of the proposed development upon protected species

What decided it

The harmful effects on character and appearance through loss of protected trees, failure to provide satisfactory living conditions due to excessive shading and restricted daylight, and unresolved concerns about protection of protected species, significantly outweighed the limited benefits of the scheme.

Framework references: 130, 174, 179

Plan policies cited: Policy CP20, Policy CP29, Policy CP27, Policy CP21, Policy C6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.