Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20223282393

Land North of Kia-Ora, 64 Lymington Bottom, Four Marks, Hampshire, GU34 5AH

Planning appeal 3282393 at Land North of Kia-Ora, 64 Lymington Bottom, Four Marks, Hampshire, GU34 5AH (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 7 October 2022 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, including upon protected trees.

Erection of detached house and integral garage with car parking and new access

Authority
East Hampshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
GU34 5AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area, including upon protected trees
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers of the proposed dwelling with particular reference to daylight
  • the effect of the proposed development upon protected species

What decided it

The harmful effects on character and appearance through loss of protected trees, failure to provide satisfactory living conditions due to excessive shading and restricted daylight, and unresolved concerns about protection of protected species, significantly outweighed the limited benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP20Policy CP29Policy CP27Policy CP21Policy C6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 179

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

33 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Hampshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013353
    85 Chase Road, Lindford, Bordon, GU35 0RS
  2. Allowed29 October 20266013368
    9 Nightjar Road, Bordon, GU35 0GJ
  3. Allowed28 October 20266012533
    362 Catherington Lane, Catherington, Waterlooville, PO8 0TU
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011297
    Land Rear of 74 - 76 Sunderton Lane, Clanfield, PO8 0NT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266006152
    Hurlands, Gentles Lane, Passfield, Liphook, GU30 7RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.