Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 May 20223282455

31-33 Hood Avenue, London, N14 4QH

‘sub-division of the sites and erection of 2 no x 2-storey detached dwelling houses’

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Philpott M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties with regard to light, outlook and privacy
  • whether or not the proposal would provide an adequate standard of living accommodation for its occupiers in respect of internal space
  • the effect of the proposal on parking in the vicinity of the site
  • whether or not the proposal would be satisfactory in respect of flood risk and make adequate provision for sustainable drainage
  • whether or not the proposal would provide adequate sustainable construction measures

What decided it

The substantial weight attached to the significant harm to character and appearance and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers outweighed the modest housing benefits, even under the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

the adverse impacts of granting permission significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the development when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole

Framework references: 11, 12, 14

Plan policies cited: DMD6, DMD7, DMD8, DMD37, CP30, D3, DMD10, D6, DMD5, DMD8, CP4, T6, DMD45, DMD48, CP24, DMD61, CP21, SI12, SI13, DMD49, DMD50, DMD51, DMD53, DMD55, CP20, CP22, CP31, SI3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.