Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20223282675

71, Darrington Road, East Hardwick, Pontefract, WF8 3DS

extensions to front and rear dormers, and the erection of a detached poolhouse to rear

Authority
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Cryan M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of the hydrotherapy pool, which the Inspector found to be substantially a matter of personal choice rather than necessity.

Framework references: 137, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy D23

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.