Planning appeal decision
71, Darrington Road, East Hardwick, Pontefract, WF8 3DS
extensions to front and rear dormers, and the erection of a detached poolhouse to rear
- Authority
- Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cryan M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriate development and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of the hydrotherapy pool, which the Inspector found to be substantially a matter of personal choice rather than necessity.
Framework references: 137, 147, 148, 149
Plan policies cited: Policy D23
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®