Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 August 20223282702

Hill House Cottage, Frith Lane, Wickwar, South Gloucestershire, GL12 8PB

Planning appeal 3282702 at Hill House Cottage, Frith Lane, Wickwar, South Gloucestershire, GL12 8PB (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 15 August 2022 by Inspector Sabu R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would meet the policy exception for new dwellings in the countryside as set out in paragraph 80e of the Framework.

described as, ‘construction of new country house of exceptional design (Paragraph 79 house)’

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sabu R
Postcode
GL12 8PB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would meet the policy exception for new dwellings in the countryside as set out in paragraph 80e of the Framework
  • the effect of the proposed development on the setting and significance of nearby listed buildings

What decided it

The proposal failed to meet the Paragraph 80(e) exception for new dwellings in the countryside because the main house, while incorporating some exceptional detailing, was not truly outstanding in overall design and would appear unduly dominant in the landscape, and it would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the setting of nearby listed buildings without sufficient public benefit to justify that harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS5CS34CS4ACS9PSP40PSP17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 80Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012302
    61 Durban Road, Bristol, BS34 5HG
  2. Allowed16 October 20266014921
    Land At 39 Bude Road, Filton, BS34 7HW
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266011871
    49 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266010963
    Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266009931
    Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.